I don’t know how many times I have sent learners off to find information with a phrase like “Google it,” or “Have a look online and see what you find.” Without intending to, I have sent my learners off to explore the ocean of information that is the World Wide Web equipped with little more than a make-shift raft and paddle. Before this course, I had never fully considered the challenges that reading the Web presents or that learners need and can be taught to use specific strategies designed to help them become effective navigators, consumers, and producers of the information that makes up today’s vast digital landscape.
Indeed, my most striking revelation as a result of this course has been coming to understand the necessity of teaching Web reading skills. Eagleton and Dobler (2007) stress that the literacy skills needed to effectively and efficiently read the Web are essentially the same as those needed for traditional reading; however, Web readers must apply these skills and strategies in a much more complex reading environment. Hypertext documents, which “allow the reader to select her own path through extensive networks of textual and multimedia information,” create a reading situation in which a text “[can] literally change its characteristics as a result of being read” (Eagleton & Dobler, 2007, p. 33). And as readers navigate the Web, they must contend with rapidly changing text structure and purpose, with a multitude of potential distractions, and with the heavy integration of visual images as they attempt to understand and construct meaning from what they have read. This is a highly complex process and demands a strong set of reading strategies backed up with ample online practice.
Compounding the complexity learners face is the fact that Web texts can be produced and published by anyone, making evaluation for reliability and bias a critical issue in Web literacy. Unlike traditional printed texts which have a clear and limited scope, contain images meant to reinforce facts, and have gone through a thorough editing process, “many Internet texts are not carefully edited, link to vast amounts of related information, and are designed to deceive or persuade young readers” (Coiro, 2005, p. 33). Concern about the reliability of Internet texts is shared by Leu et al (2004) who acknowledge the “essential need [for Web readers] to understand the stance of the person producing a message, the motive behind the message, and the need to critically evaluate these messages” (p. 1587). Fortunately, through the instruction, modeling, and practice of effective evaluation strategies, learners can be taught to be critical consumers of Internet information – that is, if we educators are ourselves 21st century literate.
As a result of the knowledge and experience I have gained in this course, I feel I am in a much better position to effectively guide students in the online inquiry process in the future. I look forward to sharing my new knowledge with learners as I guide them in finding their own questions - the kind which, to use Thornburg’s (2004) words, “take hold of the learner and don’t let go until an acceptable answer is found” (p. 4). Going forward, I intend to structure learner inquiry projects to include ample time for instruction and guided practice in the new literacy skills needed to locate, evaluate, and synthesize information found on the Web. Further, I have gained both the inspiration and confidence needed to expand my repertoire to include a variety of student generated multimedia products which will give learners the opportunity to present what they have learned not only to their teacher or classmates, but to a potentially global audience, thereby becoming part of a “society of ownership [in which every person has] the ability to contribute ideas and experiences to the larger body of knowledge that is the Internet” (Richardson, 2009, p. 4). In the process I hope to help learners understand “the ethics and social responsibility of having anonymous power…at [their] fingertips” (November, 2008, p. 51).
I emerge from this course with a clear professional development goal: to expand my knowledge of and experience with guided inquiry as an approach to learning, and integrating the instruction and practice of new literacy skills and Web 2.0 technology into my content curriculum in the process. To accomplish this goal, I will take several steps. Firstly, I will build on my learning in this course by seeking out educators and professional literature that can further expand my knowledge of the inquiry-based approach. Secondly, I will gain concrete experience in the classroom by integrating online inquiry into my current, more traditional curriculum, and by reflecting on those experiences in order to improve, refine, and extend my use of inquiry-based learning. Thirdly, as I guide learners through the inquiry process, I will focus on the careful integration of new literacy skills through explicit instruction, modeling, and guided practice. These skills will include developing essential questions, searching for and locating information, evaluating Web sites for usefulness and reliability, synthesizing information from several online sources, ethical use, and using Web 2.0 tools to collaborate and communicate what was learned to others. Finally, I will build my repertoire of multimedia products by exploring what has been done in other classrooms, by tapping the knowledge of more experienced colleagues through networking, blogs and Web sites such as www.edutopia.org and www.classroom20.com, for example, and by bravely trying out technology-based products side by side with my students in the classroom.
Through this course I have gained new understanding and appreciation for the complexity of Web reading and of the urgent need for learners to acquire strategies that will help them to create knowledge in a complex digital landscape. I have also been inspired by the seemingly endless possibilities for students to communicate what they have learned to others in an authentic, meaningful, and creative way. Most importantly, I have come to understand that the inquiry process provides learners with a real opportunity to explore their world, expand and pursue their interests, and engage in meaningful, lifelong learning (Kuhlthau, 2007).
References
Coiro, J. L . (2003). Rethinking comprehension strategies to better prepare students for critically evaluating content on the Internet. New England Reading Association Journal, 39(2), 29–34.
Eagleton, M. B., & Dobler, E. (2007). Reading the web: Strategies for internet inquiry. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell, & N. J. Unrau, Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.) (pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
November, A. (2008). Web literacy for educators. Thousands Oaks: Corwin Press.
Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wiks, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Thornburg, D. (2004). Inquiry: The art of helping students ask good questions. (Executive Briefing No. 402). Retrieved from http://www.tcpdpodcast.org/briefings/inquiry.pdf
Posts
testing
ReplyDelete